Break Out Session

I want to say something.

It’s something that’s actually quite difficult for me to talk about, even now. Until a few years ago, I would never have dreamt of admitting to feeling this way. Not even to myself.

Growing up, it was a sentiment I didn’t hear expressed often. I’ll be clear: we were by no means explicitly banned from talking about it, but it was something that just wasn’t really discussed in our house.

And yet despite this,  it’s a feeling that I continue to experience on an almost daily basis, and sometimes more often – although God knows I’ve worked hard over the years to contain, suppress, or ignore it.

Five years ago, if you’d told me that it would be something I’d eventually say to my friends, discuss in a women’s group, or write about in a blog read by hundreds of strangers, I’d have laughed in your face. And yet this weekend, something happened that reminded me why it’s so important to talk about this feeling.

I know that some people will feel uncomfortable reading what I’m about to say. They might feel anxious about the possibility of having to think about it themselves. But it’s probably quite important to get past this. It’s only words, after all, although the meaning those words convey is anything but simple.

Here goes.

I’m hungry.

I’m hungry, and I want to eat. To clarify: at the time of writing, I want to put something roughly the size of a sandwich into my mouth, mash it up with my teeth, and swallow it down into my stomach.

I’m guessing that at this point, roughly a sixth of you don’t understand what the hell I’m going on about. That’s OK: you guys were always going to find this difficult.

For the remaining five sixths of you who do at least sort-of see, to whatever degree, where I’m going with this, I’d like to make things even clearer.

I don’t want to eat something because I’m feeling sad, or angry, or bored, or guilty, or hungover (although I am) or because I need a reward (I definitely don’t). I’m pretty sure I haven’t done something bad for which I deserve punishment. No: I want to eat something because I haven’t yet eaten today and my stomach is yowling and growling and contracting and squishing its way slowly up through my torso to throttle my BRAIN.

It’s important for me to make that distinction. You see, for a long time, I was so used to eating for any reason but hunger that I didn’t always understood what it really meant. For about fifteen years, food, for me, wasn’t about satisfying hunger. It wasn’t even about pleasure. It was about lots of other things, like anxiety, and panic, and self-hatred  – but then, so was not-food.

At this point I’d like to invite the one sixth and the five sixths of you to face each other in the safe, virtual space of D For Dalrymple, and agree on how completely fucking ridiculous that is.

It’s not like I avoided eating – quite the opposite. My mum was (is) a big advocate of a way of eating she calls ‘French’ – the idea being that you take what you want from a selection of vast serving dishes, leaving the rest to be stored in a series of smaller bowls that archaeologists will one day use to date her fridge.

This way of eating is totally logical – if you are a sentient adult, understand how food works, and have a measure of self-control. It doesn’t, however, work massively well for a twelve-year-old girl whose sole competitive edge over her talented younger sibling lies in the number of boiled potatoes she can put away in ten minutes.

During my teens I managed to learn to smoke, to kiss, and to lie, but actually LOST the ability to register and respond to the physical signs of hunger and satiety. And at the same time, I was convinced that for a girl like me to even talk about food was disgusting, shameful, and embarrassing.

I’m a grown-up now, living in my own space, making my own food decisions, totally absolving my parents of responsibility for my adult behaviours. I’m also at a stable weight and am in possession of a BMI that in theory makes me technically obese, but in practise means I fill out clothes nicely (and, importantly, in the right places, which is something I haven’t always been able to say). In recent years, my turbulent relationship with food and my body has settled down. But old habits die hard, and certain attitudes remain that are hard to bury.

I know I’m not the only woman to feel this way. And I know that I’m not the only feminist to feel this way, because I went to a seminar this weekend where 200 of the most educated, intelligent, coherent and utterly kick-ass females in London took it in turns to share stories about how food and body image controlled their lives to varying degrees.

Endangered Species, the group that facilitated the seminar at the UK Feminista 2011 conference, has recently launched a campaign called Ditching Dieting. Their aim is to raise awareness of the food, diet and beauty industries that work alongside one another to make money out of the insecurities that the same companies work tirelessly to create and nurture in men and women – particularly women – around the world.

The hope is that women who have long since been manipulated by these industries, the media, and their own cultures, can get access to the knowledge and support they need to reclaim their bodies and eating habits. It’s a campaign that I’m 100% ready to get behind, especially as one of D For Dalrymple’s favourite feminist writers, Susie Orbach, is involved*.

Some of the statistics brought up during the Endangered Bodies presentation were extremely sobering, though of course already known to Orbach readers – for example, the proven 95% recividism rate (that’s ‘failure’ to you and me) among dieters, and the chilling facts about corporate ownership of popular diet regimes (Weight Watchers is owned by Heinz, Jenny Craig by Nestlé).

Yet by far the most powerful element of the seminar was the 40 minute slot given over to delegates’ accounts of their own experiences of food, eating, and body image. Although it took a while for people to pluck up the courage to share their own experiences, soon hands were shooting up all over the room and a microphone passed around to allow people to be heard over the background noise of general feminism**.

While there were plenty of body-positive stories, it soon became apparent that many of them came as a kind of punchline to a deeply moving account of pain and self-punishment. An inspirational fourteen-year-old who despaired of her classmates’ body dysmorphia was a sadly isolated voice.

One young woman stood up and spoke of her experience growing up with the steadfast belief that her dreams – travelling to Australia, learning French, writing a novel – would be within her reach, if only she could lose weight. Another came from a sporty family and felt incapable of reconciling their strict food-as-fuel views with her own, more complex relationship with food. A particularly harrowing tale came from a woman whose female relatives were all food- and weight-obsessed. This woman had been able to identify these problems as an adult and was trying to work through them, but had been shocked, when she asked her 6-year-old niece what she wanted to be when she grew up, to receive the answer ‘thin’***.

I found that last story almost unbearably poignant, and it evidently registered with other delegates, too: one of the speakers, counsellor Rania Khan, brought it up again in the wider forum of Feminist Question Time. I was pleased that the issue was raised here, because I sometimes feel that feminist discourse around weight, food and body image can occasionally be relegated to the context of ‘other’ women: non-feminists, the unenlightened, the  eating-disordered, the very young, the victims. Not strong women. Not Feminists.

One woman at the seminar recalled her feelings of utter disbelief when she realised that she had developed an eating disorder ‘despite’ her strong feminist beliefs. And that’s just it. It doesn’t matter how emancipated, how confident, how educated, how strong you are: none of that stuff makes a body impervious to the tacit, low-level misogyny that pervades our governments, workplaces, shops and homes.

I sometimes think that, as a feminist, it’s often easier to be more vocal about those issues that don’t have so much of an immediate impact on my own life. Strip clubs – boo! Genital mutilation – bad! Miss World – fuck off! Cosmetic surgery? I’d have to be actually tripping over my labia before I’d consider taking a scalpel to them, you BASTARDS.

But subtly suggest that my hips could be a little on the slenderer side and that I would be happier as a result, and odds are I’ll drink it up like a pint of Sam Smiths’ finest. Thin = good is a message that has been transmitted to me at every stage of my life since I was a tiny child. It’s insidious, hard to pin down: humiliating to have fallen for.

When you’re a kick-ass feminist in a large group of other kick-ass feminists, there is enormous pressure on you to be consistently kick-ass. It can be difficult to find the courage to own and voice any negative or self-destructive feelings you have about food or body image. No-one wants to be a victim. No-one wants to play into the hands of critics. No-one wants to let the team down.

That’s why it’s so, so important that feminist groups and meetings provide a safe, welcoming space for the women who occasionally have recourse to be a little less kick-ass than they’d generally like. So well done, Endangered Species and well done, UK Feminista.

And to those women who took the floor  at the Endangered Bodies seminar: I salute you. You are brave, and intelligent, and strong, and beautiful. And I would have been right up there with you, telling my own story… if I hadn’t been so very, very hungry.

* I can recommend Bodies (2009) and the seminal Fat Is A Feminist Issue (1978) as particularly life-changing. Susie Orbach is to me what Germaine Greer is to Caitlin Moran: where Caitlin looks up to the Goddess Greer, I refer to the Oracle Orbach. However, I suspect that the way I feel about Orbach working on Unilever brand Dove’s Campaign For Real Beauty resembles how Caitlin feels whenever GG says mean stuff about other feminists or does something really mental: not cool, Susie. Not cool.

** The sound of background feminism kind of gentle, thrilling hum, punctuated by fierce ululations of joy. It’s almost impossible to describe. You really have to hear it for yourself. Why not become a feminist?

*** You’ll be pleased to hear that this anecdote had a happy ending. Years later, when asked the same question, the little girl had adjusted her expectations. She now hopes to gain a university degree.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Six-nipple dog jacket

Happy flipping Hallowe’en.

This post will mainly concern clothes: specifically, the many issues that I have with the process that leads to their acquisition, and the reasons behind my dissatisfaction with the system as it stands.

If there’s one thing I really want you to take from this – and I think you’ll find that I’ve worked hard to drive the point home – it’s that I generally don’t enjoy shopping. Not clothes, not white goods, not presents, not even the supermarket. (Especially not the supermarket. Many’s the Friday evening I’ve found myself standing at a self-scan till at Sainsbury’s, holding a single onion and shouting ‘VALIDATE ME, YOU BASTARD’).

Clothes shopping is the worst. I know it’s something that many women are supposed to enjoy (source: Grazia magazine, 2007), but I don’t. Call me unfeminine, but I find it hard to savour  the prospect of spending money I don’t have on something I don’t really need and probably won’t even like in a year’s time, if it hasn’t fallen apart by then.

Then there’s the lack of control that come from not knowing what you’re looking for, or whether any given shop will stock it. Browsing is often futile: at best boring, and at worst a trigger for full-blown clinical depression. If, like me, you are adversely affected by laziness, poor self-esteem, and baked potatoes, it leaves you open to all kinds of mental anguish. Given the choice of activity, I’d prefer having a sit down and a good old stare at the wall to trying on clothes*.

Funny, then, that I seem to spend many of my Saturday afternoons in clothes shops. Like any other good young capitalist consumer, I can be perceived at any given time to be lacking a key piece: watertight boots, a new work dress, a winter coat, pants… These things ‘must’ be purchased if I am to stay warm, look nice, and enjoy the respect of my peers.

I’ve worked out that, to achieve these goals, my 5”5’ size 14-16 frame generally requires fitted dresses, well-cut trousers, sculpted tops, and tailored jackets in good-quality natural fibres. What it gets on the high street is badly-cut inadequate scraps, in material that feels like it might melt if you stand too close to a radiator.

My savings account and gin habit prohibit me from frequenting the higher-end shops. Anyway, I’ve got no desire to go around looking like an extra from Made In Chelsea, when all I want is something that fits well and won’t fall apart on its first outing. Plus, I happen to know that, once a year, Dorothy Perkins sells a dress that is perfect in every way: I just want them to send me a memo, so I know which weekend to block in my diary.

Quite a few friends have suggested that, as I’m of a classical figure and bent, I should try vintage clothing. You’re like Christina Hendricks off of Mad Men (they say). You’re like Marilyn Monroe! She was a size 16! Yes! I read it somewhere! Marilyn Monroe was a size 16!**

Yeah, well, I don’t like hunting for bargains in vintage shops. I know that lots of people do: I’m constantly meeting them at parties, with their stunning clothes and immaculate retro make-up. They dispense ironic cupcakes and cocktails. They radiate well-earned sartorial smugness.

The thing is, I feel the same way about hunting for bargains as you do about hunting baby piglets. It’s all riffling through racks of suspicious-smelling clothes for hours (literally, hours) until the law of averages kicks in and you make your once-in-a-lifetime find. Frankly, that’s time that I don’t have to spend. Those onions won’t scan themselves.

My unwillingness to more fully engage with the shopping experience means that I generally have one item of clothing that I really, really like and wear as often as possible, a couple of ‘I suppose that will do’ substitutes for laundry times, and a wardrobe full of clothes bought on the principle that they physically fitted around my body and limbs when I tried them on five minutes before closing time on the day before a special occasion.

So why participate at all? Why not just pack it all in, buy 15 mens T-shirts in a range of colours and a new pair of jeans every 2 years and to hell with the haters? As part of my extensive research for this post, I spoke to Caroline, 26, a music teacher from London. (I met Caroline in Chappells and we went for a pint.) Caroline initially shocked me by referring once or twice to ‘that feeling you get when you just have to spend some money’. I was feeling about my person for Saneline flyers before realising that, however much I ostensibly hate the tawdry greed of consumer culture, I totally share this feeling.

I LIKE having nice things. Like my lovely new clock. Looking at it makes me happy. Ah. Ah. So red. So lovely. So… time-keeping***.

Like Caroline, I experience and (though I hate to admit it) enjoy that warm feeling of new ownership, whether it’s related to a new clock, a good book or a coat that fits perfectly. But unlike Caroline, I don’t associate that fuzzy feeling with the process of acquisition: the jostling, the choosing, the decisions, the expenditure. Which is perhaps why my latest purchase cut out all but one of those hurdles.

I mentioned before that I maintain a rolling list of ‘Apparel I Need To Own Lest I Die Of Exposure Or Worse, Prompt Strangers To Think I Look Shit’.  A recent addition to this list was an autumn jacket, to bridge the awkward gap between summer cardigan and winter coat. Shopping for any piece of clothing generally takes about seven weeks. This jacket was acquired in about ten minutes last Thurday. Here’s how it happened:

18.55 Arrive to meet Jo.

18.58 Receive text message from Jo, running ten minutes late.

18.59 Pop into Jigsaw to ‘have a look’.

19.09 Emerge from Jigsaw in state of heightened confusion, bearing a posh carrier bag containing a £189 jacket.

19.15 Express confusion to Jo re: the acquisition of said jacket, citing the music in the shop, the limited time available, the comfortingly authoritative manner of the shop assistant and the deceptive ease of debit payment as reasons for spending more on this single garment than on the last three winter coats combined.

19.16 Accept reassurance from Jo that jacket can always be returned and precious funds recovered at the weekend.

19.18 Order bottle of house red.

[…]

21.45 Arrive home, unpack jacket and try on.

21.46 Decide that the arrangement of three sets of buttons along the bosom causes the wearer to resemble a nursing dog.

21.48 Locate nail scissors.

[…]

At 21.50 I found myself suddenly very, very sober, sitting on my bedroom floor and holding a de-buttoned £189 jacket in my arms like the body of a child.

And I yearned for the days when clothes shopping involved my mum. No decisions, no expenditure, no drama.

*This can sometimes be the best use of a changing room.

** Marilyn Monroe was NOT a size 16. She was 5”5’. I am 5”5’. I am what a 5”5’ size 16 woman looks like, and it is not this.

*** Incidentally, I bought that clock in Peter Jones. I don’t think that going into Peter Jones even COUNTS as shopping. It’s not stressful. It’s rarely crowded. The people who work there are spontaneously nice to you, even if you’re very obviously not going to buy anything. It’s like a lovely holiday to a foreign country where  everyone is polite and the temperature is always just right.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

D For Dalrymple is no longer initially confused

The astute reader (and frustrated Googler) will observe that I have changed D For Dalrymple’s tagline.

Yes, ‘initially confused’ did contain the word ‘initial’, but, as Kate pointed out,  ‘it doesn’t really mean anything, so…. not good.’

She also gave the following unsolicited yet sterling advice: ‘Why don’t you decide what you actually want to say and then think about the best way to express it, rather than the other way around?’

Kate has rumbled D For Dalrymple’s hitherto secret modus operandi. I seldom know what I want to say until I have said it, and sometimes, not even then.

Obviously I couldn’t be bothered to work through all my complex feelings about this blog and what it represents and where it’s going, so I’ve just pinched a line from a song that I truly, genuinely believe to be ALL ABOUT ME*. (Apart from the going down alleyways with beer-bellied men. That was one time, people).

 

Well, this roly-poly little bat-faced girl just opened the freezer to insert a half bottle of Cypriot gin and found a pair of tartan trousers in the meat drawer.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment